PTMs as critics, or saving classical music

Yesterday’s article referred to part 1 of Ann Midgette’s piece originally printed in the Washington Post, and it provided some interesting insights into the role PTMs, or amateur musicians, play in the field of classical music. Today’s follow-on article offers Ms. Midgette’s thoughts on the role of PTMs, and the populace in general, as critics.

I have to admit to you that on my first reading, I didn’t get much out of this. But the second reading prompted several lightbulbs to go off over my head, and I’ll confess to thinking about it a great deal ever since.

I play many different types of music, but classical music has such depth and richness overall that I consider it my favorite. Overall. But to be quite honest about it (in homage to Ms. Midgette), I just don’t like modern compositions as a general rule. I’m painting with a broom here, so please grant me a bit of leeway. 

There is a reason some classical compositions are considered classics, i.e. they endure and endear. Although many were considered to be a challenge to accepted standards when they were written, all of the works considered classics today have what an old friend of mine referred to as “toe tap-ability”. Simply put, the listener can tap their foot with the music as it is being performed…or walk out humming it, thinking of the great concert they just heard.

Many modern works seem to have been exercises in sound combinatorics rather than musical compositions. Many seem so focused upon showcasing the various sections of an orchestra that they forget music is performed for someone. And lest anyone think I’m advocating going “100% pop”, let me assure you that I am not…but music that is neither pleasant to play nor hear doesn’t press boundaries as much as it condemns the art form to irrelevance.

My tastes are not universal, and I’m very glad of that! What do you think? Does classical music need criticism to really thrive? Regardless of our individual tastes, should we just politely clap for it all? Continue with obligatory standing ovations? Or does that contribute to a growing detachment and/or dissatisfaction with classical music in general? Please leave us a comment with your thoughts; we’d love to hear them.

Keep playing,

Mark

Related Articles:

• PTMs keep the music alive!
• United States Marine…and Part-Time Musician!
• Part-Time Musicians Are All Around You
• PTMs in the news: “passion players” in the UK
• PTMs in the news: LA lawyers

PTMs keep the music alive!

I knew when I read this that you’d want to read it too. PTMs – amateur musicians – have contributed so much to the vibrancy of music throughout the ages. At times when it was dangerous or impractical to be a full-time musician, PTMs also kept the dream alive.

This article from the Philadephia Inquirer is probably harder on FTMs than I would be – I’ve known far too many who sincerely love their “job” and experience their music to the fullest; but the author does make some excellent points. PTMs often play with more license because there is less cutthroat competition to be there in the first place. The fact that the music is a release for them, rather than a full-time occupation, certainly doesn’t hurt, either.

Whether classical music is your bag or something else, there is a lot to consider here. What do you think? Do you allow yourself to really enjoy your music? Do you think you’d enjoy it more – or less – if your paycheck depended upon it? Post a comment and let us know!

Keep playing,

Mark

Related Articles:

• PTMs as critics, or saving classical music
• Three Secrets to Enjoy Practicing!
• United States Marine…and Part-Time Musician!
• Part-Time Musicians Are All Around You
• PTMs in the news: “passion players” in the UK